Papers tagged with: #оцінювання-llm

7.5
psychometric_modeling

Every Token Counts: Exact Likert-Scale Distributions for Measuring LLM Attitudes and Biases

Davood Wadi, Mohsen Ghodrat, Matthew Philp · arXiv (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.10503 · gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Read full analysis →

7.5
psychometric_modeling

Every Wrong Answer Counts: Option-Level Psychometrics for LLM Multiple-Choice Benchmarks

Xiao Fei, Yang Zhang, Sarah Almeida Carneiro, Michalis Vazirgiannis · arXiv (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2608.02966 · gemini-3.1-flash-lite

Read full analysis →

7.5
psychometric_modeling

An Interpretable and Scalable Framework for Evaluating Large Language Models

Xinhao Qu, Qiang Heng, Hao Zeng, Xiaoqian Liu · arXiv (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2605.07046 · gemini-3.7-flash

Read full analysis →

7.4
psychometric_modeling

Scalable Text-Embedding-informed Cognitive Diagnosis of Large Language Models

Jia Liu, Zhiyu Xu, Yuqi Gu · arXiv (2026) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2603.14676 · gemini-3.7-flash

Read full analysis →

7.3
psychometric_modeling

Which AI model is truly the best: how reliable are public benchmarks of frontier AI models?

Miloš Kankaraš · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2026) · doi:10.5281/zenodo.22998204 · gemini-3.7-flash

Read full analysis →